Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Moral Code: "Designer Babies"


            In the Upfront Magazine, “Designer Babies,” the author Patricia Smith talks about how scientists are learning how to genetically engineer babies’ traits and genes for both medical and social reasons. I think that medically this will be good for society because it will help prevent certain diseases that result from genetic defects. However, changing and determining babies’ more physical and personal traits (such as height, eye color, IQ, etc.) challenges my moral code, and I believe that it is unethical.
            The first reason that I think that this is unethical is because it would not be good for society. Eventually, if choosing babies’ traits became normal, there would not be any individuality anymore in society, and more and more people will feel that they have to look a certain way in order to be accepted. There would be no more flaws, or talent, or distinctive personalities. I think that, even though we may not love them, our flaws help to make up who we are. And even sometimes, we, ourselves, are the only ones that see certain flaws in ourselves. People determining what they think is “perfect,” and putting it into another human being is very wrong.
            The second reason that I disagree with this is because I believe that there is no “right” way for a person to look. It’s just a matter of people’s opinions. Social media portrays that the celebrities and models that you see in magazines are perfect; perfect hair, perfect personality, perfect look, and the perfect body. It tricks society into feeling that in order to be beautiful, we need to look a certain way. However, I believe that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and that no one look is perfect. In addition, I think that fate should decide what a person ends up looking like, and not us.
            In conclusion, genetically engineering a baby in order to give it desired physical or personal traits, goes against what I believe in. I think that people should be born naturally and that everyone has flaws. Even in a picture perfect world, there will still be flaws. I believe that as we grow up, we learn to embrace our flaws, and by changing them, society would be ruined.
            

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Romeo and Juliet Essay



In “Romeo and Juliet,” a tragic story written by William Shakespeare, two young teenagers, Romeo and Juliet came from two different feuding families. Romeo a Montague, and Juliet a Capulet. Fate made them fall in love, and they married without their families knowing. To summarize it, the story ended with both Romeo and Juliet killing themselves due to their love for one another. Many different factors contributed to their deaths, such as Friar Lawrence, (who allowed them to go on with their dangerous and not fully thought out plan), the Nurse, and the rivalry between the Montagues and the Capulets. However, in the end, there is no one else to blame for their deaths than the people that committed the suicide themselves. Romeo and Juliet were to blame for their own deaths.
            The first reason that Romeo and Juliet were to blame was because of their impulsivity and that they didn’t think through their actions, not unlike many teenagers. For example, as quoted in the text,
“Then plainly know my heart’s dear love is set
on the fair daughter of rich Capulet.
As mine on hers, so hers is set on mine,
And all combined, save what thou must combine
By holy marriage. When and where and how
We met, we wooed, and made exchange of vow
I’ll tell thee as we pass, but this I pray,
That thou consent to marry us today. (2.3.61-85)
Romeo was being very rash and felt that he could easily marry Juliet just days after he met her. He also did not take into consideration the consequences that could come from it. Also in addition, Juliet decided to marry Romeo without fully thinking about it, which was also a very rash decision.
            Another reason that Romeo and Juliet were to blame is because they were unaccepting of advice. For instance, in the play, the nurse cares a lot about Juliet and her decisions. As quoted in the text, the Nurse says,
“Faith, here it is.
Romeo is banishèd, and all the world to nothing
That he dares ne'er come back to challenge you.
Or, if he do, it needs must be by stealth.
Then, since the case so stands as now it doth,
I think it best you married with the county.
Oh, he’s a lovely gentleman.
Romeo’s a dishclout to him. An eagle, madam,
Hath not so green, so quick, so fair an eye
As Paris hath. Beshrew my very heart,
I think you are happy in this second match,
For it excels your first. Or if it did not,
Your first is dead, or ’twere as good he were,
As living here and you no use of him. (3.5.225-238) After Juliet’s father, Lord Capulet, orders that she marry Paris, Juliet grudgingly agrees. The Nurse, who wants the best for her, suggests that she does marry Paris instead of Romeo because Romeo was banished. She believed that Paris would benefit Juliet so much more than Romeo would. Instead of considering the Nurse’s advice, Juliet was furious with the Nurse and felt betrayed because the Nurse had helped her to marry Romeo. The Nurse knew what was best for her. If Juliet had listened, she would’ve still been alive. In addition, Friar Lawrence gave Romeo advice, which Romeo ignored. For instance, in the play the Friar said,
“Holy Saint Francis, what a change is here!
Is Rosaline, whom thou didst love so dear,
So soon forsaken? Young men’s love then lies
Not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes.
Jesu Maria, what a deal of brine
Hath washed thy sallow cheeks for Rosaline!
How much salt water thrown away in waste
To season love that of it doth not taste!
The sun not yet thy sighs from heaven clears,
Thy old groans ring yet in my ancient ears.
Lo, here upon thy cheek the stain doth sit
Of an old tear that is not washed off yet.
If e'er thou wast thyself and these woes thine,
Thou and these woes were all for Rosaline.
And art thou changed? Pronounce this sentence then:
Women may fall when there’s no strength in men.” (2.3.69-85) Friar Lawrence disagreed with Romeo wanting to marry Juliet (he later gave in, to try to bond the two families together), and told him that what he was feeling was not real love since he had just loved Rosaline a few days ago. He told Romeo that he only loved her because of her superficial qualities. Both Romeo and Juliet refused to listen to advice from others, which caused them to make very rash decisions that lead to their demise.
            In conclusion, there were many factors that led to Romeo and Juliet’s death, such as their families, the Friar, the Nurse, etc. However, Romeo and Juliet were the sole cause for their own deaths. If Romeo and Juliet hadn’t acted impulsively and had thought about the consequences for their actions, they most likely wouldn’t have died. Though fate caused their love, and even though it was very unfair that they couldn’t be together to due a very irrational rivalry, if they had waited and had not rushed through love, and listened to the advice of others (the Nurse and Friar Lawrence), there would be a good chance that they would’ve lived.

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Banning A Hated Word Response


In the article, “Should a Hated Word Be Banned?” Rabbi Dov Lipman says that “every country has to establish certain value-based limits” in her speech. My opinion on this controversy is that I do not agree.
            If every country were to establish value-based limits, it would take away freedom of speech. No matter how hated a word might be; banning it wouldn’t be a solution to the issue. For example, in the article it says, “The First Amendment protects freedom of expression even if the views expressed are extremely offensive to most people.” I believe that the First Amendment is correct and that freedom of speech should not be overlooked.
            Another reason I do not agree with Lipman’s statement is because everyone has different values/beliefs. For example, in the text Fuchs states, “You measure the freedom of speech in a democratic country in the freedom to say these disturbing and annoying things, not in what is nice and pleasant to hear.” Whether you believe that a certain belief, opinion, or a certain word that someone says is adequate or inadequate, it should be respected.
            In conclusion, I disagree with Lipman’s statement. A country should not be in charge of what people are allowed to say or believe in because of freedom of speech. In addition, different people have different values and insights towards certain things, and whether agreeable or non agreeable, you have to respect their opinions. 

Friday, February 28, 2014

A Mid-Summer's Day (Sonnet Poem)


Shall I compare thee to a sunset on a mid-summer’s day?
Beautiful as a rose
With sunlight, shining through the bay
You are the one I chose.

You shine through the cracks,
Never letting darkness take over who you are
Light materializing from the dark shack,
You will always be my star.

When the sun sets in my direction
The day will end
But even though you are filled with imperfections,
You will never be penned. 

Day will change to night,
But you will always be bright