In an article called, "Watching You" in Upfront Magazine, by Patricia Smith, it talks about how the government is going against our privacy and watching us in order to protect us from deadly threats. The U.S government has been "secretly collecting Americans' telephone records and tracking foreigners over sites like Yahoo and Facebook." I think that it is wrong for the government to be doing this.
It's violating Americans' privacy. For example, in the text it says, "But this spring's news that the U.S. government has been secretly collecting Americans' telephone records and tracking foreigners over seas on sites like Yahoo and Facebook has raised questions about how much privacy is worth sacrificing to keep the nation safe." I don't think that it's right that the government can see what we put on social media even though we think that it's private.
It's also violating the Fourth Amendment. For example, in the text it says, "the idea of a right to privacy comes from the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which protects against 'unreasonable searches and seizures'."I don't think that the government should be allowed to not follow the Fourth Amendment.
In conclusion, I agree that the government should find ways to protect us from dangers such as terrorists, however, I don't think that our privacy should be violated through social media and phone records in order to do that,
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Where Your Cell Phone Goes to Die (Response)
In an article in Upfront Magazine, it talks about how our e-waste (electronic waste) is being
given to other countries and is not being recycled properly. I think that it is wrong for electronic
manufacturers to pay developing countries to take the United State's waste.
The electronic waste can affect people. For example in the text it says, "In far-flung, mostly
impoverished places in Ghana, India, and China....of children inhaling the smoke from phone casings
as they identify and separate different kinds of plastics for recyclers." And also in the text it says, "most
scientists agree that exposure poses serious health risks, especially to pregnant women and
children....[and] can cause irreversible neurological damage and threaten the development of a child."
The waste can affect people in terrible ways and can put them at risk. It's not right that the United
State's waste is causing this.
Also, the e-waste is not being recycled properly. For example in the article it says, "Changes in
the way manufacturers glue, screw, and solder components together would make it easier to dismantle
discarded phones and thus reduce the risks posed by crude recycling techniques, like those employed
by children in Ghana." If we don't help change the way that we recycle our e-waste, it can affect our
environment, hurting us. As the quote states, making the components of the electronics easier to
dismantle could help us recycle better. If we did this and recycled the waste on our own, it could help
our environment and the people being affected by the e-waste in the places that the United States is
sending our waste to.
In conclusion, I think that wrong for manufacturers to be paying other countries to take the
Unites States' e-waste. It affects the people in the countries that the e-waste is being sent to and it is not
being recycled properly. We should recycle our e-waste in the U.S. If we recycled our e-waste on our
own, it would help the people and the environment.
given to other countries and is not being recycled properly. I think that it is wrong for electronic
manufacturers to pay developing countries to take the United State's waste.
The electronic waste can affect people. For example in the text it says, "In far-flung, mostly
impoverished places in Ghana, India, and China....of children inhaling the smoke from phone casings
as they identify and separate different kinds of plastics for recyclers." And also in the text it says, "most
scientists agree that exposure poses serious health risks, especially to pregnant women and
children....[and] can cause irreversible neurological damage and threaten the development of a child."
The waste can affect people in terrible ways and can put them at risk. It's not right that the United
State's waste is causing this.
Also, the e-waste is not being recycled properly. For example in the article it says, "Changes in
the way manufacturers glue, screw, and solder components together would make it easier to dismantle
discarded phones and thus reduce the risks posed by crude recycling techniques, like those employed
by children in Ghana." If we don't help change the way that we recycle our e-waste, it can affect our
environment, hurting us. As the quote states, making the components of the electronics easier to
dismantle could help us recycle better. If we did this and recycled the waste on our own, it could help
our environment and the people being affected by the e-waste in the places that the United States is
sending our waste to.
In conclusion, I think that wrong for manufacturers to be paying other countries to take the
Unites States' e-waste. It affects the people in the countries that the e-waste is being sent to and it is not
being recycled properly. We should recycle our e-waste in the U.S. If we recycled our e-waste on our
own, it would help the people and the environment.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Every Soul A Star by Wendy Mass Response
In the book, “Every Soul A Star,” by Wendy Mass, there are three main protagonists:
Ally, Bree, and Jack. They all have different issues and they deal with them in
various ways.
So far in the book, I
think that Ally’s issue is that she’s lonely. Even though she doesn’t really
mention it that much in the book, I think that her living alone on a
campground, not being able to experience anything like friends, causes her to
feel like shes alone. She deals with her loneliness by pretending that she’s
friends with constellations that she calls Eta, Peggy, and Glenn.
Bree’s issue so far is
that she’s insecure. She feels that she doesn’t have the potential to do
anything other than being pretty. She deals with this by pretending to be
someone that she’s not and by covering up her whole face with make up and by
acting like she’s high maintenance. Her parents can see her potential, but she
can’t. For example in the text it says, “And the best thing about being
beautiful? No one (except maybe my deluded parents who don’t understand that
modeling is a perfectly respectable career choice) expects me to be anything
else.” Bree thinks that she’s not capable of everything else besides modeling.
I think Jacks issue is
the same as Bree’s issue. However, he deals with it in a different way. Jack
doesn’t think that he has the potential to do anything. He deals with this by
being independent and keeping his problems to himself. For example in the book
it says, “I gave up trying a long time ago. I also gave up trying to pay
attention in class. And trying to get people to like me. It’s just too much
effort. When they look at me, other kids just see a big pudgy kid who sits in
the back of every class drawing in his art book…all I want to do is be left
alone.” He only sees himself as the “big pudgy kid” that can’t do anything, and
thinks that he will never live up to his older brother who is a football player
in highschool.
Overall, Ally, Jack,
and Bree, all deal with their issues in different ways throughout the book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)